"postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform
pav at FreeBSD.org
Wed Nov 16 09:28:23 UTC 2011
On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000:
>>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have
>>> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)?
>> It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking
>> activity postconf wants to run?
> Wietse, in a post on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence
> to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat:
> Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it
> determines the local interfaces and their netmasks).
> I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the
> user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data
> structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results.
>  http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html
That's entirely possible.
Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a
package that will then be redistributed to other machines?
Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on FreeBSD
from now on.
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
More information about the freebsd-ports