VPN through NAT?
Eric Anderson
anderson at centtech.com
Sun Aug 13 18:14:38 UTC 2006
On 08/13/06 09:21, Troy Settle wrote:
> Probably not the best list to ask this on, but it's the closest that I'm
> subscribed to...
>
> I have several customers who use VPN (Windows PPTP) to connect to their
> Corporate networks. The first was sitting behind NAT on a FreeBSD
> router. The PPTP did not work. I moved them out of NAT and onto a
> regular IP, and it worked fine. I then swapped out the FreeBSD box with
> a Cisco 2620 and again tried the PPTP via NAT, but still it wouldn't work.
>
> Another customer is behind a Cisco 804 and his PPTP also did not work
> when his network was behind NAT, so I have to assign a static subnet for
> him.
>
> From home, sitting behind NAT on my Netgear router, I can turn up PPTP
> connections all day long. What gives with FreeBSD and Cisco's
> implementation of NAT that PPTP doesn't want to work?
>
> Thanks,
>
I'm no expert on the subject, but I recall hitting this in the past and
reading about passing GRE packets through, along with a couple of ports
to forward to the VPN endpoint.
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the freebsd-isp
mailing list