svn commit: r276565 - in head/gnu: lib/libstdc++/doc usr.bin/diff usr.bin/diff/doc usr.bin/gdb usr.bin/gperf usr.bin/gperf/doc

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:33:41PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steve Kargl <
> > sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:34:56PM +0000, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > > > Author: ngie
> > > > Date: Fri Jan  2 20:34:55 2015
> > > > New Revision: 276565
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/276565
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > >   Remove gnu/ info pages to unbreak the build with MK_GCC != no, etc
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does this mean that FreeBSD is now shipping utilities without
> > > documentation?
> > >
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure we've been doing that for a long, long time.
> > 
> > Note that MK_GCC=no is the default on head for the tier-1 platforms.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, I know what the default is for tier-1, which is somewhat
> irrelevant to my question.  bapt@ has removed info pages (and
> Garrett seems to have cleanup after bapt).  Noting that FreeBSD
> has more than just tier-1, the question remains.  Is FreeBSD
> now shipping utilities without proper documentation?
> 
The man pages remains, for binutils for examples, the manpages were generated
out of the texinfo files meaning the manpage contains the same amount of
informations

Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20150102/e7706c20/attachment.sig>