svn commit: r276565 - in head/gnu: lib/libstdc++/doc usr.bin/diff usr.bin/diff/doc usr.bin/gdb usr.bin/gperf usr.bin/gperf/doc

Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Fri Jan 2 21:33:42 UTC 2015


On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steve Kargl <
> sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:34:56PM +0000, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > > Author: ngie
> > > Date: Fri Jan  2 20:34:55 2015
> > > New Revision: 276565
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/276565
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   Remove gnu/ info pages to unbreak the build with MK_GCC != no, etc
> > >
> >
> > Does this mean that FreeBSD is now shipping utilities without
> > documentation?
> >
> 
> I'm pretty sure we've been doing that for a long, long time.
> 
> Note that MK_GCC=no is the default on head for the tier-1 platforms.
> 

Yeah, I know what the default is for tier-1, which is somewhat
irrelevant to my question.  bapt@ has removed info pages (and
Garrett seems to have cleanup after bapt).  Noting that FreeBSD
has more than just tier-1, the question remains.  Is FreeBSD
now shipping utilities without proper documentation?

-- 
Steve


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list