svn commit: r259642 - head/sys/netinet

Jack Vogel jfvogel at gmail.com
Fri Dec 20 18:01:18 UTC 2013


I agree with Gleb, ifdef 0 is silly, after all, that's why we have source
history, its
not like the offending code is gone forever :) So I guess its both of us
muttering Gleb :)

Jack



On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 20 December 2013 00:44, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> > I didn't get to review of actual patch, but IMO it would be better
> > just to remove the code, not ifdef 0 it. The code ifdefed has zero
> > probability to be enabled in its current form. If we ever fix it, code
> > would look very different.
> >
> > No reason to do followup commit, that was just me muttering.
>
> I figured it would be nicer in the short term to #if 0 it out whilst
> some other discussions went on, just to make it really obvious in the
> short term where the check was done. It's quite possible I'll
> eventually just trim it entirely out.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -a
>


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list