svn commit: r456124 - head/Mk/Uses

[Mathieu Arnold]

Le 12/12/2017 à 20:17, Ben Woods a écrit :
> I’m not sure I fully understand this warning, so perhaps it needs a
> few more words about “why”?

Yes, this is warning is about a case that does not exist, but I was
tired of arguing.

> Even with flavors, it is still likely people will want 2 flavors of a
> port concurrently installed.

Well, if the two flavors do not conflicts, they can.

> Does adding flavors already handle concurrent installation, making the
> concurrent keyword unnecessary with flavors enabled?

concurrent is still needed for Python ports that installs files outside
of the Python lib thing.

This warning is about Python ports that:

- Do not use flavors
- Have a USES=python defined in a way that limits it to either Python 2
*or* Python 3
- Use USE_PYTHON=concurrent

There are actually no ports doing that. (Because it is stupid.)


-- 
Mathieu Arnold