svn commit: r439421 - in head/www/nginx: . files

[Boris Samorodov]

28.04.2017 02:46, Sergey A. Osokin пишет:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:26:12AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 27.04.2017 20:09, Vsevolod Stakhov пишет:
>>
>>> Come on, 20 years is enough time frame to state that IPv6 must be
>>> supported by any sane OS. I'd vote to remove this legacy knob from the
>>> ports completely (and that will simplify pkg job as well).
>>
>> Well, I'll speak only about me and my $JOB. We have several tens of
>> servers out there. And *none* of them have IPV6. *We* don't need it.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the majority of them run Linuxes. Well, I see your
>> point. But then... we'll just have more Linuxes. That's it.
>>
>> BTW, I don't ask someone to maintain code/patches for me. I just say
>> do whatever you want and get pleasure. Life will not stop.
> 
> I don't think I fully understand your concern.

My concern was about global removal which Vsevolod wrote about.

In general, I don't like when building host configurations is
tested/acted upon.

> On your boxes you have disabled IPv6, so in your situation you can use
> both types packages: a package built on a box with IPv6 (I guess IPv6
> hasn't been enabled in nginx.conf yet) as well as a package built on a
> your boxes with IPv6 disabled.

Good. The last time you wrote about it I've got an impression that
I should use additional patches.

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
"It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory."