svn commit: r332017 - head/devel/subversion17

[Matthias Andree]

Am 07.12.2013 15:07, schrieb Tijl Coosemans:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:03:16 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> +--On 29 octobre 2013 22:01:05 +0000 Olli Hauer <ohauer at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> | -PKGNAMESUFFIX=	17
>> | +#7setting7PKGSUFFIX7not7possible7wo.7having7a7Mk/Uses7file7and7fixing7a7
>> | bunch7of7ports
>> | +#PKGNAMESUFFIX=	17
>>
>> I've grepped through the whole ports tree, and I couldn't find any port
>> that depends on subversion1[67] using their package name, as in
>> subversion<1.8:{$PORTS}..., they only depends on the svn binary being
>> there, so adding PKGNAMESUFFIX will not hurt any bit.
>>
>> If I'm wrong, please show me which ports have their dependencies that needs
>> fixing.
> 
> The subversion-java slave port sets PKGNAMESUFFIX=-java, so setting
> PKGNAMESUFFIX=17 in the master makefile would override that.
> 
> The other slave ports (perl,ruby,python) set PKGNAMEPREFIX so maybe
> the java port should do that too.
> 

Is there any purpose in keeping old garbage around?
Such as new client not working with old server?
If not, let's just axe the older versions rather than fix package name
conflicts.