svn commit: r542221 - in head/www: flashplayer linux-flashplayer

Tue Jul 14 19:06:19 UTC 2020

On 20. 7. 14., Tĳl Coosemans wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:47:38 -0400 Jung-uk Kim <jkim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> On 20. 7. 14., Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:15:23PM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote:  
>>>> New Revision: 542221
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/542221
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>>   Update to 32.0.0.403.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>   head/www/flashplayer/Makefile
>>>>   head/www/linux-flashplayer/Makefile
>>>>   head/www/linux-flashplayer/distinfo
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>>  
>>>>  PORTNAME=	flashplayer
>>>>  PORTVERSION=	32.0
>>>> -PORTREVISION=	18
>>>> +PORTREVISION=	19  
>>>
>>> Is there a reason to abuse PORTREVISION instead of PORTVERSION=32.0.0.387
>>> like in the other port?  I didn't search the history, but if there is,
>>> perhaps it deserves a comment in the Makefile.  
>>
>> No reason.  Actually, I don't like it myself but I didn't bother because
>> it will be removed at the end of this year.
>>
>> https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/end-of-life.html
> 
> When I created this port I thought it wouldn't have to be rebuilt for
> every minor release.  Isn't the wrapper library for two minor releases
> identical?

It is identical but we have to re-run installation script to make sure.

Jung-uk Kim