svn commit: r542221 - in head/www: flashplayer linux-flashplayer

Tue Jul 14 18:31:12 UTC 2020

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:47:38 -0400 Jung-uk Kim <jkim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On 20. 7. 14., Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:15:23PM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote:  
>>> New Revision: 542221
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/542221
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   Update to 32.0.0.403.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>   head/www/flashplayer/Makefile
>>>   head/www/linux-flashplayer/Makefile
>>>   head/www/linux-flashplayer/distinfo
>>>
>>> ...
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  PORTNAME=	flashplayer
>>>  PORTVERSION=	32.0
>>> -PORTREVISION=	18
>>> +PORTREVISION=	19  
>> 
>> Is there a reason to abuse PORTREVISION instead of PORTVERSION=32.0.0.387
>> like in the other port?  I didn't search the history, but if there is,
>> perhaps it deserves a comment in the Makefile.  
> 
> No reason.  Actually, I don't like it myself but I didn't bother because
> it will be removed at the end of this year.
> 
> https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/end-of-life.html

When I created this port I thought it wouldn't have to be rebuilt for
every minor release.  Isn't the wrapper library for two minor releases
identical?