svn commit: r497400 - in head/net: . tigervnc tigervnc-server tigervnc-viewer

[Koichiro Iwao]

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:22:15PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> 
>  If net/tigervnc now has only SERVER as the default options, it is no
>  longer worth keeping it as a meta-port because the resultant package
>  is an empty one which has a single dependency on tigervnc-server.  An
>  entry to MOVED is sufficient in this case.
> 
>  Even if you want to keep this, at least you might want to take care
>  of backward compatibility with the old tigervnc. Both of SERVER and
>  VIEWER should be added back to it since it had VIEWER in
>  OPTIONS_DEFAULT.

Thank you for the advice. I'll consider that.

>  LICENSE.TXT should not be installed into DOCSDIR.  It will be
>  installed by specifying LICENSE_FILE in a per-package directory, so
>  you can simply drop it from DOCS.

I understand now. The conflicting LICENSE.TXT in DOCSDIR is installed
not by ports framework but upstream cmake. I was wondering why it
conflicts that should not conflict.

https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/blob/6011f96cdc5b8f68a864d7f6294d9a45030b3533/cmake/BuildPackages.cmake#L89

OTOH, LICENSE file installed by ports framework is located here, right?

  /usr/local/share/licenses/tigervnc-server-1.9.0_1/LICENSE

Indeed LICENSE.TXT installed by upstream cmake can simply be dropped.

-- 
meta <meta at FreeBSD.org>