svn commit: r446552 - head/devel/dcd-server

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:45:38PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 26/07/2017 ?? 12:39, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:22:45PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >> Le 26/07/2017 ?? 09:01, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
> >>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >>>> Le 25/07/2017 ?? 03:44, Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez a ??crit :
> >>>>> New Revision: 446552
> >>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/446552
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Log:
> >>>>>   - Add pkg-plist forgotten on previous commit
> >>>> You need to bump PORTREVISION so that the package is rebuilt with
> >>>> the plist.
> >>> Why would it get packaged without (with an empty) plist?
> >> What are metaports?
> > "Abstract" ports that don't install things on their own but pull a set of
> > dependencies?  How's it relevant to `devel/dcd-server', unless I'm missing
> > something?
> 
> I guess Jeopardy! is not that a universal thing.

ENOPARSE, sorry.

> A port without a plist is perfectly valid, it will get build, and
> packaged just fine. The framework cannot know that you forgot to commit
> the plist. So if you commit a port and forget the plist, it will get
> built and the package will have dependencies, and no files. If you then
> add the plist later, the framework cannot know that the package it built
> earlier needs to be rebuilt because it has files now, so PORTREVISION
> needs to be bumped.

Shouldn't `check-plist' kick in and packaging fail due to untracked files
being installed and plist forgotten?

./danfe