svn commit: r422505 - head/archivers/snappy-java

[Mathieu Arnold]

Le 21/09/2016 à 15:19, John Marino a écrit :
> On 9/21/2016 03:19, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> Le 20/09/2016 à 17:19, John Marino a écrit :
>>> Author: marino
>>> Date: Tue Sep 20 15:19:52 2016
>>> New Revision: 422505
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/422505
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   archivers/snappy-java: new fedora MASTER_SITE to unbreak
>>
>> I'm picking a commit at random.
>>
>> If our distcache is not a valid upstream, then someone else's distcache
>> is not either.
>
> It doesn't look like a cache to me.  It looks like that, unlike
> FreeBSD, they keep a copy of distribution tarballs that they use. 
> It's not a cache, but a primary repository.
>
> That's what it looks like to me.  If you know that it's definitively
> just a cache, that might change the story.

From what I can gather, it is the cache fedora uses for building their
packages, a bit like what our distcache is. So, well, yes, it is a
cache. Like the ubuntu cache you are also using on launchpad.net. or the
rpmfusion thing you also found.

Trying to go around every rule and policy we have is really getting old.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20160921/e289c390/attachment.sig>