svn commit: r340925 - head/devel/py-singledispatch

Mathieu Arnold mat at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jan 24 21:56:26 UTC 2014


+--On 24 janvier 2014 21:32:26 +0100 Marcus von Appen <mva at FreeBSD.org>
wrote:
|> >   USE_PYTHON=	yes
|> > -USE_PYDISTUTILS=	easy_install
|> > +USE_PYDISTUTILS=	yes
|> >   PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST=	yes
|> > 
|> >   .include <bsd.port.mk>
|> 
|> Marcus, shouldn't changes like that follow PORTREVISION bump or I
|> misunderstand something?
| 
| The package contents change, but it does not have any influence on
| dependent ports nor on functionality nor on requirements. Thus
| I do not see it as necessary to bump the port revision.
| 
| I'm fine however with bumping PORTREVISION, if that's the desired
| approach of dealing with that.

It *is* the desired approach, the rule is simple, if the package can
changes, whatever option or knob being used, PORTREVISION is to be bumped.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list