svn commit: r340925 - head/devel/py-singledispatch

[Ruslan Makhmatkhanov]

Marcus von Appen wrote on 25.01.2014 00:32:
> On, Fri Jan 24, 2014, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
>
>> Marcus von Appen wrote on 24.01.2014 23:06:
>>> Author: mva
>>> Date: Fri Jan 24 19:06:04 2014
>>> New Revision: 340925
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/340925
>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r340925/
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>     - Convert USE_PYDISTUTILS=easy_install to yes
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>     head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile
>>>
>>> Modified: head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile	Fri Jan 24 19:04:50 2014	(r340924)
>>> +++ head/devel/py-singledispatch/Makefile	Fri Jan 24 19:06:04 2014	(r340925)
>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ COMMENT=	provides single-dispatch generi
>>>    LICENSE=	MIT
>>>
>>>    USE_PYTHON=	yes
>>> -USE_PYDISTUTILS=	easy_install
>>> +USE_PYDISTUTILS=	yes
>>>    PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST=	yes
>>>
>>>    .include <bsd.port.mk>
>>
>> Marcus, shouldn't changes like that follow PORTREVISION bump or I
>> misunderstand something?
>
> The package contents change, but it does not have any influence on
> dependent ports nor on functionality nor on requirements. Thus
> I do not see it as necessary to bump the port revision.
>
> I'm fine however with bumping PORTREVISION, if that's the desired
> approach of dealing with that.
>
> Cheers
> Marcus

I think it's better to bump to ease bug reports investigation - there 
will be no situation where users and ports tree will have different 
packages.

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

T.O.S. Of Reality