svn commit: r342811 - head/devel/py-Products.MimetypesRegistry

[Ruslan Makhmatkhanov]

Alex Kozlov wrote on 06.02.2014 15:01:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:52:54AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> +--On 6 février 2014 14:49:46 +0400 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
>> <cvs-src at yandex.ru> wrote:
>> | Antoine Brodin wrote on 06.02.2014 14:05:
>> |> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
>> |> <cvs-src at yandex.ru> wrote:
>> |>> Thanks a lot for this! But why you changed UZE_ZIP with EXTRACT_SUFX?
>> |>
>> |> Hello,
>> |>
>> |> You don't need unzip (infozip) to extract this distfile,  bsdtar
>> |> handles it fine.
>> |>
>> |> Cheers,
>> |>
>> |> Antoine
>> |
>> | Heh, to be honest, I was pretty sure that USE_ZIP conditionally depends
>> | on archivers/unzip on systems with old libarchive (that doesn't knows how
>> | to unzip) and drops this dependency on modern systems. And I even saw
>> | that conditional code somewhere, that, according to bsd.port.mk, was
>> | never committed.
> I've patch for this, there was even exp-run or two, but progress is stalled.
> Anyway, it seems that bapt@ has different plans for this.

Baptiste, would you clarify this case please?

>> | Anyway, there are many zope/plone ports with USE_ZIP
>> | defined, so changing this one will not eliminate unzip dependency for
>> | them.
>> It wouldn't work, because while libarchive can handle most of the .zip
>> distfiles we have, it can't handle some of them. (Don't ask me which, I've
>> forgotten since then.)
> The libarchive 3.0.4 can handle all zip archives in the ports tree.

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

T.O.S. Of Reality