svn commit: r342811 - head/devel/py-Products.MimetypesRegistry

[Alex Kozlov]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:52:54AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 6 février 2014 14:49:46 +0400 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
> <cvs-src at yandex.ru> wrote:
> | Antoine Brodin wrote on 06.02.2014 14:05:
> |> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
> |> <cvs-src at yandex.ru> wrote:
> |>> Thanks a lot for this! But why you changed UZE_ZIP with EXTRACT_SUFX?
> |> 
> |> Hello,
> |> 
> |> You don't need unzip (infozip) to extract this distfile,  bsdtar
> |> handles it fine.
> |> 
> |> Cheers,
> |> 
> |> Antoine
> | 
> | Heh, to be honest, I was pretty sure that USE_ZIP conditionally depends
> | on archivers/unzip on systems with old libarchive (that doesn't knows how
> | to unzip) and drops this dependency on modern systems. And I even saw
> | that conditional code somewhere, that, according to bsd.port.mk, was
> | never committed.
I've patch for this, there was even exp-run or two, but progress is stalled.
Anyway, it seems that bapt@ has different plans for this.

> | Anyway, there are many zope/plone ports with USE_ZIP
> | defined, so changing this one will not eliminate unzip dependency for
> | them.
> It wouldn't work, because while libarchive can handle most of the .zip
> distfiles we have, it can't handle some of them. (Don't ask me which, I've
> forgotten since then.)
The libarchive 3.0.4 can handle all zip archives in the ports tree.


-- 
Alex