svn commit: r304800 - in head: . textproc textproc/aspell textproc/aspell-without-dicten textproc/en-aspell

[Doug Barton]

On 10/07/2012 11:09, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 6 October 2012 23:14, Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 10/06/2012 15:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2012 14:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>>> No longer install the english dictionary (please use textproc/en-aspell if you
>>>>>   want the english dictionary)
>>>>
>>>> What was the motivation for this change?
>>>>
>>> Motivation is simplifying binary package, this was stupid to have 2 different
>>> ports for aspell + one port for the dictionary, when we do not lose any features
>>> with having a single aspell port not incompatible with another one.
>>
>> Makes sense, thanks for the explanation.
>>
>> It would probably have been useful to include that in the commit
>> message, for future reference. Ideally commit messages should be roughly
>> 2/3 "why", and 1/3 "what."
>>
> 
> 3/3 "why", 0/3 "what"-- we have inline SVN diffs nowadays!

Yeah, but they don't show up in the logs.


-- 

    I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do
    something.  And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
    I can do.
			-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)