svn commit: r304800 - in head: . textproc textproc/aspell textproc/aspell-without-dicten textproc/en-aspell

[Chris Rees]

On 6 October 2012 23:14, Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 15:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 09/24/2012 14:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>> No longer install the english dictionary (please use textproc/en-aspell if you
>>>>   want the english dictionary)
>>>
>>> What was the motivation for this change?
>>>
>> Motivation is simplifying binary package, this was stupid to have 2 different
>> ports for aspell + one port for the dictionary, when we do not lose any features
>> with having a single aspell port not incompatible with another one.
>
> Makes sense, thanks for the explanation.
>
> It would probably have been useful to include that in the commit
> message, for future reference. Ideally commit messages should be roughly
> 2/3 "why", and 1/3 "what."
>

3/3 "why", 0/3 "what"-- we have inline SVN diffs nowadays!

Chris