svn commit: r41824 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook

[Tom Rhodes]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 07:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Dru Lavigne <dru.lavigne at att.net> wrote:

> 
> > > I agree that it was a good choice that time but the
> > two-way merges add 
> > > quite much overhead. When the branch was created, we
> > still didn't have a 
> > > real XML toolchain. But now we have it so DocBook
> > profiling is possible. 
> > > In this way, we can work with a single source and mark
> > up print-only and 
> > > online-only sections. We can also mark up
> > version-specific text so there 
> > > is no need to maintain two different development
> > lines.
> > > 
> > > Gabor
> > 
> > This sounds really cool, I think we should have a
> > discussion
> > on how to do this, if we want to do this, and how we could
> > go about using only one version.  Personally, I kind of
> > like
> > a development version where we can make changes, discuss
> > them,
> > fix them, as a team, and have them slowly merged into a
> > version
> > that will appear on the web.  :)
> 
> 
> This is a good item to add to the agenda for the June 17 doc sprint. Tom, will you be attending that one in person (in Cincinnati?) or online?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dru

I haven't found a hotel room yet.  :(  Where are you staying?

--
Tom Rhodes