ImageMagick bump

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Sun May 6 02:54:18 UTC 2007


On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 07:02:10PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 17:02 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:54:32PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:40:20PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 15:01 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:51 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt get bumped,
> > > > > > > > > > > can you confirm?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies on
> > > > > > > > > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (otherwise
> > > > > > > > > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la files again)
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not.  There are
> > > > > > > > > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optional disabled
> > > > > > > > > > dependency.  I will recheck my script to see why some ports were not
> > > > > > > > > > bumped.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I found the problem.  My script didn't take DISTVERSION into account.  I
> > > > > > > > will send out a new, complete tarball shortly.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Maybe a diff against previous bumpage would be better, if
> > > > > > > possible...flz?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That would be very hard to generate at this point.  I mean, it would be
> > > > > > trivial if I was allowed to re-bump the ports that had already been
> > > > > > bumped.  Otherwise I'd have to manually fiddle with my list.
> > > > > 
> > > > > OK, I guess flz will just have to cope :)
> > > > 
> > > > New diffs are up:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg.diff.bz2 (full diff)
> > > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg_incr.diff.bz2 (incremental
> > > > diff on top of last diff)
> > > 
> > > transcode is still missing :(
> > 
> > I guess this is because it doesn't enable ImageMagick by default but
> > instead autodetects it if it is present.
> > 
> > This kind of thing is going to be a nightmare to track down.  I wonder
> > if we should just bump everything that installs a .la in case the port
> > has some obscure case in which it will pick up a dependency on X11R6.
> 
> I don't think this is necessary.  Now that I have my script working for
> DISTVERSION, I'm pretty sure I got all the ports that will needed to be
> bumped.

OK.  When the next build finishes I will grep the packages for .la
files that reference /usr/X11R6 just to double-check for the default
cases.  Thanks again for taking care of that.

Kris


More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list