ImageMagick bump

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 17:02 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:54:32PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:40:20PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 15:01 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:51 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt get bumped,
> > > > > > > > > > can you confirm?
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies on
> > > > > > > > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (otherwise
> > > > > > > > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la files again)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not.  There are
> > > > > > > > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optional disabled
> > > > > > > > > dependency.  I will recheck my script to see why some ports were not
> > > > > > > > > bumped.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I found the problem.  My script didn't take DISTVERSION into account.  I
> > > > > > > will send out a new, complete tarball shortly.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Maybe a diff against previous bumpage would be better, if
> > > > > > possible...flz?
> > > > > 
> > > > > That would be very hard to generate at this point.  I mean, it would be
> > > > > trivial if I was allowed to re-bump the ports that had already been
> > > > > bumped.  Otherwise I'd have to manually fiddle with my list.
> > > > 
> > > > OK, I guess flz will just have to cope :)
> > > 
> > > New diffs are up:
> > > 
> > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg.diff.bz2 (full diff)
> > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg_incr.diff.bz2 (incremental
> > > diff on top of last diff)
> > 
> > transcode is still missing :(
> 
> I guess this is because it doesn't enable ImageMagick by default but
> instead autodetects it if it is present.
> 
> This kind of thing is going to be a nightmare to track down.  I wonder
> if we should just bump everything that installs a .la in case the port
> has some obscure case in which it will pick up a dependency on X11R6.

I don't think this is necessary.  Now that I have my script working for
DISTVERSION, I'm pretty sure I got all the ports that will needed to be
bumped.

Joe

-- 
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team      ::      gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/attachments/20070505/170eeecb/attachment.pgp