Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:04:32PM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 19:56, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Dear port maintainers,
> >
> > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> > LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
> > LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> > each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
> > ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> > them.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kris "Annoying Reminder Guy II" Kennaway
> > LATEST_LINK          PORTNAME                       MAINTAINER
> > ==========================================================================
> > git                  devel/git                      anholt at FreeBSD.org
> > git                  misc/git                       ports at FreeBSD.org
> > imake                devel/imake-4                  x11 at FreeBSD.org
> > imake                devel/imake-6                  x11 at FreeBSD.org
> 
> IIRC it was agreed that since imake-4 and imake-6 don't both produce packages 
> on same FreeBSD version LATEST_LINK could stay as it is for both. Is it still 
> OK if things stay like this or should ports/96293 be committed? (Or was it 
> never OK and I just misremembered?)

I'd prefer the warning to be silenced.  You can either commit the PR
or make the LATEST_LINK conditional on X_WINDOW_SYSTEM being set
(i.e. for xorg have the LATEST_LINK in imake-4 and vice versa).  That
will be a NOP, but it will shut up the script.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/attachments/20060509/10c6d816/attachment.pgp