Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS

[Dejan Lesjak]

On Sunday 07 May 2006 19:56, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear port maintainers,
>
> The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
> LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
> ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> them.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kris "Annoying Reminder Guy II" Kennaway
> LATEST_LINK          PORTNAME                       MAINTAINER
> ==========================================================================
> git                  devel/git                      anholt at FreeBSD.org
> git                  misc/git                       ports at FreeBSD.org
> imake                devel/imake-4                  x11 at FreeBSD.org
> imake                devel/imake-6                  x11 at FreeBSD.org

IIRC it was agreed that since imake-4 and imake-6 don't both produce packages 
on same FreeBSD version LATEST_LINK could stay as it is for both. Is it still 
OK if things stay like this or should ports/96293 be committed? (Or was it 
never OK and I just misremembered?)


Dejan