XFree86 4.4 port ??

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Fri May 21 10:25:51 PDT 2004


On Friday 21 May 2004 11:10, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
> * "Pedro F. Giffuni" [Fr, 21 Mai 2004 at 04:22 GMT]:
> > I appreciate the great work that has been done lately to support the
> > X.org server, but I recall there was a working port of Xfree86 4.4. Any
> > *technical* reason why it hasn't been committed?
>
> Hi, thanks for raising this discussion, From my testing, I think there
> are no technical reasons, that it can not be committed within 24 hours.

I do think that having one X11 server(+libraries) in ports instead of two 
(which on top of all else share lots of code and will make it supereasy for 
users to get messy, mixed installations) is a good thing - and that one 
package should be X.org - for technical reasons.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/attachments/20040521/f7168821/attachment-0001.bin


More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list