[HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

[Jeremy Chadwick]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 08:13:39PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Now we can get back on the ipv6 option.
> > 
> > so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or without
> > ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are
> > building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for it.
> > How bad it will impact you if we do remove that option?
> 
> Whenever I use ports over FreeBSD-provided packages (or to use ports to
> build my own packages), I often disable IPV6 support.  The lengthy
> response below should explain why.
> {brevity snip}

This was sent to the wrong mailing list; was intended for -ports.
Sorry for the noise.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                 jdc at koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                      PGP 0x2A389531 |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.                        |