traceroute -n difference between STABLE-11 and CURRENT

Mariusz Zaborski oshogbo at freebsd.org
Mon Oct 1 14:43:40 UTC 2018


On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On systems with STABLE-11 @ r338696, I found that
> 
> traceroute -n ...
> 
> led to:
> 
> traceroute: cap_enter: Function not implemented
> 
> I rebuilt the systems with
> 
> WITHOUT_CASPER
> 
> commented in /etc/src.conf
> 
> and (to be safe ?)
> 
> CAPABILITY_MODE
> CAPABILITIES
> 
> uncommented in the kernel definitions
> 
> And traceroute -n can now be successfully used.
> 
> Being curious, I traced this behaviour to r338475 by oshogbo, which is 
> documented as a MFC of r314000
> 
> BUT i NEVER met this problem on my CURRENT systems which are now at 
> r338331 (so after r314000), and are built WITHOUT_CASPER and without 
> CAPABILITY_MODE nor CAPABILITIES in their kernel definitions.
> 
> What am I missing (my only hint being the change from HAVE_LIBCASPER to 
> WITH_CASPER) ?
> 
> CBu

Hello,

sorry for keep you waiting. Your issue should be fixed with the r339045 in
STABLE-11.

Thanks,
-- 
Mariusz Zaborski
oshogbo//vx		| http://oshogbo.vexillium.org
FreeBSD committer	| https://freebsd.org
Software developer	| http://wheelsystems.com
If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is!!1

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20181001/b134b004/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list