traceroute -n difference between STABLE-11 and CURRENT
Mariusz Zaborski
oshogbo at freebsd.org
Mon Oct 1 14:43:40 UTC 2018
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On systems with STABLE-11 @ r338696, I found that
>
> traceroute -n ...
>
> led to:
>
> traceroute: cap_enter: Function not implemented
>
> I rebuilt the systems with
>
> WITHOUT_CASPER
>
> commented in /etc/src.conf
>
> and (to be safe ?)
>
> CAPABILITY_MODE
> CAPABILITIES
>
> uncommented in the kernel definitions
>
> And traceroute -n can now be successfully used.
>
> Being curious, I traced this behaviour to r338475 by oshogbo, which is
> documented as a MFC of r314000
>
> BUT i NEVER met this problem on my CURRENT systems which are now at
> r338331 (so after r314000), and are built WITHOUT_CASPER and without
> CAPABILITY_MODE nor CAPABILITIES in their kernel definitions.
>
> What am I missing (my only hint being the change from HAVE_LIBCASPER to
> WITH_CASPER) ?
>
> CBu
Hello,
sorry for keep you waiting. Your issue should be fixed with the r339045 in
STABLE-11.
Thanks,
--
Mariusz Zaborski
oshogbo//vx | http://oshogbo.vexillium.org
FreeBSD committer | https://freebsd.org
Software developer | http://wheelsystems.com
If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is!!1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20181001/b134b004/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list