/dev/crypto not being used in 12-STABLE
lists at jnielsen.net
Thu Dec 6 23:24:38 UTC 2018
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI <delphij at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen <lists at jnielsen.net> wrote:
>> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341391). I noticed today that neither machine seems to be utilizing /dev/crypto. Typically I see at least ssh/sshd have the device open plus some programs from ports. But 'fuser' doesn't list any processes on either machine:
>> # fuser /dev/crypto
>> Both machines are running custom kernels that include "device crypto" and "device cryptodev". One of them additionally has "device aesni".
>> Is anyone else seeing this? Any idea what would cause it?
> Your average OpenSSL applications should not use /dev/crypto, if your
> goal is to utilize AES-NI (which does not require /dev/crypto). On
> capable systems, AES-NI would be used automatically (and it's faster
> this way).
Thanks for the response. Is there a way to verify that AES-NI is being used for e.g. ssh? I'm also curious why/when/how the change to not use (or support?) /dev/crypto from base openssl was made.
More information about the freebsd-stable