Needs triage ..

[Kubilay Kocak]

On 7/09/2014 12:49 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:47 +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>  > On 6/09/2014 11:23 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
>  > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
>  > >  > ## Ian Smith (smithi at nimnet.asn.au):
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > > Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@?  Can anyone play? :)
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list.
>  > > 
>  > > Yes, and this submitter hasn't posted in the dozen lists I take, since 
>  > > May anyway.  This may save someone having to assign a bug, but perhaps 
>  > > one shouldn't earn the 'mayCC' bit until some N>0 have been assigned?
>  > > 
>  > >  > But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which
>  > >  > happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling
>  > >  > of reports), this looks like bad hardware.
>  > >  > If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi?
>  > > 
>  > > I'm more concerned about process (vs PRs) and bulk spam potential than 
>  > > the reporting methods of any one submitter; bugzilla is overall cool.
>  > > 
>  > > cheers, Ian
>  > 
>  > Ian,
>  > 
>  > Please create an issue report assigned to bugmeister, with 'keyword:
>  > feature' describing the issue, and thoughts on different ways you can
>  > think of a mechanism potentially working.
>  > 
>  > --
>  > Kubilay
>  > for Bugmeister
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193396
> 
> No further ideas to hand beyond what I suggested above, sorry.
> 
> cheers, Ian
> 

That's perfect, thank you Ian

Koobs
for Bugmeister