Needs triage ..

[Ian Smith]

On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:47 +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
 > On 6/09/2014 11:23 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
 > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
 > >  > ## Ian Smith (smithi at nimnet.asn.au):
 > >  > 
 > >  > > Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@?  Can anyone play? :)
 > >  > 
 > >  > The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list.
 > > 
 > > Yes, and this submitter hasn't posted in the dozen lists I take, since 
 > > May anyway.  This may save someone having to assign a bug, but perhaps 
 > > one shouldn't earn the 'mayCC' bit until some N>0 have been assigned?
 > > 
 > >  > But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which
 > >  > happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling
 > >  > of reports), this looks like bad hardware.
 > >  > If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi?
 > > 
 > > I'm more concerned about process (vs PRs) and bulk spam potential than 
 > > the reporting methods of any one submitter; bugzilla is overall cool.
 > > 
 > > cheers, Ian
 > 
 > Ian,
 > 
 > Please create an issue report assigned to bugmeister, with 'keyword:
 > feature' describing the issue, and thoughts on different ways you can
 > think of a mechanism potentially working.
 > 
 > --
 > Kubilay
 > for Bugmeister

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193396

No further ideas to hand beyond what I suggested above, sorry.

cheers, Ian