Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command

Mikolaj Golub to.my.trociny at gmail.com
Fri May 24 05:32:23 UTC 2013


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:54:56AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in
> 
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
> 
> (the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner per 
> provider; old output is retained as `list' command)
> 
> to at least stable/9 ?
 
If we agreed to merge, I would prefer to both stable/9 and 8 to have
divergence between branches as minimal as possible.

> The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts 
> which one use in production.
> 
> If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny, 
> thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
> [ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck at FreeBSD.org ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

-- 
Mikolaj Golub


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list