Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command
Mikolaj Golub
to.my.trociny at gmail.com
Fri May 24 05:32:23 UTC 2013
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:54:56AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
>
> (the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner per
> provider; old output is retained as `list' command)
>
> to at least stable/9 ?
If we agreed to merge, I would prefer to both stable/9 and 8 to have
divergence between branches as minimal as possible.
> The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts
> which one use in production.
>
> If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny,
> thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
> [ FreeBSD committer: marck at FreeBSD.org ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
--
Mikolaj Golub
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list