Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?
scottl at samsco.org
Thu Mar 28 15:29:27 UTC 2013
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
From a code execution standpoint? No, it's not.
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.
From a code segment size standpoint, there's definitely some stuff that should be
made modular and optional.
More information about the freebsd-stable