Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?
ray at ddteam.net
Thu Mar 28 14:09:01 UTC 2013
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700
Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.
/me never seen embedded devices with ATA/SATA and less than 64MB of RAM.
(i386/i486 old machines does not count :) )
I'm missing something?
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Aleksandr Rybalko <ray at ddteam.net>
More information about the freebsd-stable