Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?

Aleksandr Rybalko ray at
Thu Mar 28 14:09:01 UTC 2013

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700
Adrian Chadd <adrian at> wrote:

> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.

/me never seen embedded devices with ATA/SATA and less than 64MB of RAM.
(i386/i486 old machines does not count :) )
I'm missing something?

> Thanks,
> adrian
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at"

Aleksandr Rybalko <ray at>

More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list