Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?
mav at FreeBSD.org
Thu Mar 28 07:17:30 UTC 2013
On 28.03.2013 02:43, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.
Are there many boards now with ATA, but without USB? But I agree, it
should be checked.
More information about the freebsd-stable