svn - but smaller?
John Mehr
jcm at visi.com
Thu Mar 14 02:17:49 UTC 2013
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:57:13 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block <wblock at wonkity.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, John Mehr wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
>> "Michael Ross" <gmx at ross.cx> wrote:
>>>
>>> What'd you think about a syntax extension along the
>>>lines of
>>>
>>> svnup --bsd-base
>>> svnup --bsd-ports
>>> svnup --bsd-all
>>>
>>> with automagic host selection, default to uname's major
>>>version stable branch and default target dirs?
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort
>>of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of
>>least surprise, I'm all for it. The one default that may
>>be unexpected is the defaulting to the stable branch --
>>people who track the security branches will be left out.
>>So maybe something like:
>>
>> svnup --ports
>> svnup --stable
>> svnup --security (or --release)
>
> How would you select the mirror? There are two now, and
>likely more
> later.
This is a good question. I was thinking it could be done
the same way that freebsd-update selects its mirror via an
SRV query but it looks like that's currently not an
option.
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list