ZFS "stalls" -- and maybe we should be talking about defaults?
daniel at digsys.bg
Tue Mar 5 23:03:05 UTC 2013
On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <jdc at koitsu.org> wrote:
> I say that knowing lots of people use ZFS-on-root, which is great -- I
> just wonder how many of them have tested all the crazy scenarios and
> then tried to boot from things.
I have verified that ZFS-on-root works reliably in all of the following scenarios: single disk, one mirror vdev, many mirror vdevs, raidz. Haven't found the time to test many raidz vdevs, I admit. :)
Combined with "boot environments" (that can be served many different ways), ZFS on root is short of a miracle.
ZFS on FreeBSD has some issues, mostly with huge installations and defaults/tuning, but not really with ZFS-on-root.
Of course, if for example, you follow stable, you should be prepared with alternative boot media that supports the current zpool/zfs versions. But this is small cost to pay.
More information about the freebsd-stable