status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

[Outback Dingo]

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzbauer at omnilan.de> wrote:

>  Bezüglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtime):
> > ...
> >    >>>> IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug
> >    fix. re@
> >    >>> asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, and
> >    at
> >    >>> this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing possible
> >    >>> regressions, which will only delay the 9.2-RELEASE.
> >    >>>
> >    >>> Glen
> >    >>>
> >    >>> OK, then we need a release notes telling people a sane value for
> >    >> nmbclusters and friends so that they know how to make 10gigE work.
> >    >>
> >    >> I'll poll my team for a value if someone else has one, that would
> be
> >    even
> >    >> better.
> >    >>
> >    >> --
> >    >> Alfred Perlstein
> >    >> VP Software Engineering, iXsystems
> >    >
> >    >
> >    >Is there a possibility that a separate unofficial patch set could be
> >    >released for people who want the autotuning but do not want to run 9
> >    >stable after 9.2 is released.
> >    >I would like the autotuning, but i am a little reluctent to use other
> >    >stable stuff i will get when tracking stable.
> >    >
> >    >Regards
> >    >Johan
> >
> >    Hi,
> >
> >    I think that's a good point.
> >
> >    In our company, it�s not allowed to use the stable tree for any
> >    production system. Little and useful patches are still allowed.
> >
> >    Having a central point with a description of each patch it would be
> >    much easier to update the release version with the needed patches.
>
> You're welcome using my "deploy-tools" patchsets.
> I'm deploying RELENG only, but with local patchset-policy. Originally,
> these are automtically handled during build-process with deploy-tools,
> but of course you can selective/manually apply the desired patches from
> the "local-patches" directory:
>
> ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/
>
> Best regards,
>
>
can you maybe define what exactly, this is and or where the specific
patches are derived? Ive seen the autotune
but whats the rest in here??


> -Harry
>
>