ada(4) and ahci(4) quirk printing

Chuck Burns break19 at
Tue Apr 23 13:46:38 UTC 2013

On 4/23/2013 8:15 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <jdc at> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:20:31PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>> 4) camcontrol wouldn't address the need/interest for ahci(4) quirks to
>>>> be made available.
>>> Why?
>> Because camcontrol is for CAM.  ahci(4) is not part of CAM.  The last
>> place I'd look for "poking at AHCI" (as in *actual AHCI*) is camcontrol.
>> This is one of the reasons sysctl exists -- it's a sort of "covers
>> everything" tree, on a per-device basis.
> Just on this point, these quirks aren't actually quirks of ahci(4) are
> they? They are quirks of the disks that are attached to ahci(4), and
> presumably should apply regardless of whether the disk in question is
> hooked up to ahci(4), siis(4) or even mps(4).
> To my mind, this means the quirks should belong to da(4), or at the
> very least ada(4). ada(4) and da(4) are both manipulated by CAM, so
> having this in camcontrol seems logical to me. To clarify, my mind is
> completely oblivious of how all this is implemented in software, so
> perhaps my mind needs to be changed rather than the code!

+1 for sysctl.  If you want camcontrol to handle it, then have it 
view/set the sysctl.

Chuck Burns <break19 at>

More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list