9.1-RC2 - could it be that the installer does not write the MBR?

Rainer Duffner rainer at ultra-secure.de
Sat Oct 20 00:06:08 UTC 2012


Am Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:11:30 -0400
schrieb Glen Barber <gjb at FreeBSD.org>:

> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> > If I select the "entire disk" for FreeBSD, I think it's a reasonable
> > assumption that the MBR should replaced, too.
> > Please don't make people install FreeBSD 9.0 first on disks with
> > non-FreeBSD MRRs and then upgrade to 9.1.
> > 
> 
> Can you outline for me in detail what you did when you partitioned
> your drive during the installation?

I chose "entire disk", then deleted all partitions-suggestions except
the first one and created my own partitioning scheme.
(/, swap, var, usr, maybe /var/log and /home, too)
 
> I have seen your specific issue exactly once, and reliably reproducing
> the problem has not been successful so far.
> 
> BTW, what was on the drive before you did the install, if anything?

It had a version of Solaris. Maybe Opensolaris. I don't know exactly.
And I don't know if it had zfsroot or not. I created a HW-RAID1 with
the HP P400 controller on it.
The drives were previously used in another server.

I tried to install 9.1RC2 twice on these disks and it always went back
to the grub-prompt after reboot.
Then I installed 9.0 and it's running now.






More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list