Time Clock Stops in FreeBSD 9.0 guest running under ESXi 5.0
Andriy Gapon
avg at FreeBSD.org
Thu Mar 22 16:33:33 UTC 2012
on 22/03/2012 18:13 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 22/03/2012 17:33 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following:
>>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>> on 22/03/2012 15:19 Mike Tkachuk said the following:
>>>>> kern.eventtimer.periodic: 0
>>>>
>>>> It might make sense to try 1 here.
>>>> Also you could attempt to involve mav@ directly - here is an author of the code
>>>> and an expert on it.
>>>
>>> Better ask before setting as this doubles hpet0 (with HPET) or cpu0:timer (with
>>> LAPIC) interrupt rate for me.
>>
>> Does it make your system unusable?
>> Are you comparing with pre-eventtimers version of FreeBSD?
>
> In short term - no. Haven't tested it thoroughly. Results are the same (double
> interrupt rate according to `systat 1 -v`) for:
> * i386 and amd64 9-STABLE;
> * amd64 9.0.
No comment.
> As everything related to timing/freq/acpi can be unpredictive I wouldn't recommend
> this to anyone. I own at least two Intel CPU's failing somewhere near timing/apic
> when loading cpufreq and enabling powerd.
>
What exactly you wouldn't recommend?
Let's not introduce unrelated topics and vague uncertainties.
Setting kern.eventtimer.periodic to 1 makes eventtimer subsystem to behave less
efficiently but more similar to the pre-eventtimer code. So this is #1 suggestion
when people run into some new problems with eventtimers. Which is what this
thread is about.
--
Andriy Gapon
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list