ports usable or not [was: flowtable usable or not]

[Matthew Seaman]

On 02/03/2012 16:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> Other ports aren't supported on certain target architectures but the build
>> > doesn't tell you that until after it has run for a couple of hours

> Those are also bugs.  Please send PRs for those, as well.  I am particularly
> concerned about amd64 in this regard (although I am actually only myself
> doing the package runs for sparc64 and powerpc).  We continually try to
> adjust the metadata for ports to indicate where they will and will not
> run, based on the output of pointyhat runs.  (OTOH pointyhat runs the
> src tree from "the oldest supported minor release on each branch", so
> this may be a clue .)

Which reminds me about this: ports/164638

I've kind of taken my eye of progress on that, being distracted by other
things.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20120302/e19c425e/signature.pgp