SMART
Ivan Voras
ivoras at freebsd.org
Thu Nov 12 12:56:39 UTC 2009
Thomas Backman wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
>>
>> I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so statistics and what indicates what...
>>
>> Here is for example my desktop drive:
>>
>> SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
>> Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
>> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>> 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 087 083 006 Pre-fail Always - 45398197
>> 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 096 093 000 Pre-fail Always - 0
>> 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always - 64
>> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always - 0
>> 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 084 060 030 Pre-fail Always - 247407473
>> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 089 089 000 Old_age Always - 10155
>> 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 097 Pre-fail Always - 0
>> 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always - 64
>> 187 Reported_Uncorrect 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
>> 189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
>> 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022 058 055 045 Old_age Always - 42 (Lifetime Min/Max 37/44)
>> 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 042 045 000 Old_age Always - 42 (0 20 0 0)
>> 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 062 059 000 Old_age Always - 45398197
>> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
>> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0
>> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
>> 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0
>> 202 TA_Increase_Count 0x0032 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0
>>
>> I see many values exceeding threshold but since I see it so often on other drives I don't know what the threshold is for.
> None of the your values are exceeding the threshold - it works backwards. If the value is LOWER than the threshold, you might be in trouble.
Good to know.
> Also, judging by the raw read error rate, seek error rate and hardward ECC recovered, allow me to guess that this is a Seagate drive. :-)
> (Seagate drives, perhaps among others, use these raw values way differently than others. My Hitachi 7K1000.B has 0 on those.)
Yes, it's Seagate. Statistically I have the least problems with their
drives. But I imagine that lack of standardization about these
statistics very much limits the usability of SMART, right?
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list