ACPI "blacklist" question

[Oliver Fromme]

John Baldwin wrote:
 > Oliver Fromme wrote:
 > > [...]
 > > Now i'm wondering:   Has the ACPI blacklist been removed
 > > intentionally, or is this a regression?  Certainly I did
 > > not find any mentioning of it in UPDATING or anywhere
 > > else.
 > 
 > This is a regression.  Try this fix:
 > 
 > Index: acpi_quirk.c
 > ===================================================================
 > --- acpi_quirk.c	(revision 183112)
 > +++ acpi_quirk.c	(working copy)
 > @@ -149,9 +149,9 @@
 >      if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &fadt)))
 >  	bzero(&fadt, sizeof(fadt));
 >      if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_DSDT, 0, &dsdt)))
 > -	bzero(&fadt, sizeof(dsdt));
 > +	bzero(&dsdt, sizeof(dsdt));
 >      if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_XSDT, 0, &xsdt)))
 > -	bzero(&fadt, sizeof(xsdt));
 > +	bzero(&xsdt, sizeof(xsdt));
 >  
 >      /* Then, override the quirks with any matched from table signatures. */
 >      for (entry = acpi_quirks_table; entry->match; entry++) {
 > 

Thanks for the quick reply.  I will try this on Friday
when I'm near the console.  I'm a little reluctant to
try it remotely.

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"The ITU has offered the IETF formal alignment with its
corresponding technology, Penguins, but that won't fly."
        -- RFC 2549