sysutils/fusefs-ntfs working for anyone?

Ulrich Spoerlein uspoerlein at
Tue Feb 20 15:16:05 UTC 2007

Wang Yi wrote:
> I'm using ntfs-3g now. the version is same to yours. But only the difference is the disk I 
> used is a physical disk.

I also had no luck using it on my existing NTFS partition, though I'd
like to experiment on a clean partition first.

Could you please run a test with mdconfig and mkfs.ntfs (you have to use
the -F flag)?

Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 6.2-RELEASE using fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4, fusefs-libs-2.6.2, and fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1, I 
> can mount my existing (Windows XP) NTFS partition with 'ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1 /mnt/ad0s1'.
> The following error messages about missing /proc/filesystems and modprobe can be ignored, 
> since defaults are assumed in case of missing information. (I read about it on a fusefs 
> mailing list concerning Darwin.)

The critical part seems to be the seekscript. Could one of you guys
provide me with a ktrace/kdump output, so I can investigate this
further? You should run ktrace with the -i flag and probably send the
output off-list.


Ulrich Spoerlein
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
> >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list