portaudit and portsnap acting silly.

[Adrian Chadd]

On 29/12/2007, Dave Overton <dave at syix.com> wrote:
> Fixed.
>
> For reference, it was squid, happily caching the data for me.
>
> Makes one wonder why the portsnap and portaudit servers or clients aren't
> http compliant if they use http protocols... Especially since the author of
> portsnap suggests a cache server for speed....

Grab a wireshark snapshot showing the HTTP request/reply, both from
the client -> squid and squid -> server and I'll tell you whats
busted.


Adrian
(Squid committer)

-- 
Adrian Chadd - adrian at freebsd.org