ath_hal problems on sparc64

Sascha Luck sascha at
Wed Mar 15 17:06:44 UTC 2006


On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:55, Sam Leffler wrote:
> It means the files.sparc64 rules are botched.  I just committed the
> changes to head yesterday but you posted to stable@; what version of
> the os are you running?  I will mfc the changes to releng6 as soon as
> I get the ok.

Sorry, noticed only after posting, it's RELENG6 as of 1/2 hour ago. 

> FWIW the sparc64 hal has not been tested on freebsd so far as I know.
> It is known to work on netbsd and linux and is os-independent but
> beware...

I've got a few U10s and an Atheros PCI card here if you want me to do 
some testing. Would it make more sense to pull one of them up to 
CURRENT to test this?

> 	Sam


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list