fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

[Mike Jakubik]

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> This is true, but I hope you recognise that a good part of the
> responsibility for this falls on the users when asked to test proposed
> fixes.  If the developers are not aware of remaining problems they
> can't reasonably be expected to fix them :-)
>   

Indeed, but the developers should also realize that a lot of users have 
servers in production and can not afford the downtime, or simply don't 
have the resources to test. I think the developers should also spend a 
little more time doing more extensive testing of their own code.