[HACKERS] semaphore usage "port based"?

[Marc G. Fournier]

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 14:55:10 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> That is all I'm advocatin / asking for ... some way of reverting kill(PID,
>> 0) back to the old, FreeBSD 4.x behaviour, where this works beautifully :(
>> At least until someone does get around to 'virtualization of SysV IPC' :(
>
> There's the old standby: You have the source code.
>
> You should be able to get things to work by expanding prison_check()
> into cr_cansignal() and changing the error return from ESRCH to EPERM.
> Having not tried this, I can't comment on possible adverse side-effects.

that's why I'm hoping for a more 'wide spread' fix ... right now, I have a 
work around for the problem, and the thread that has been going on 
concerning how 'per jail' IPC could be implemented looks very promising 
...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy at hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664