wi0 is always status: no carrier
Kirk Strauser
kirk at strauser.com
Fri May 13 17:01:09 PDT 2005
On Friday 13 May 2005 04:06 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Kirk's dmesg showed some interesting IRQ routing issues that might be
> the problem:
>
> pir0: <PCI Interrupt Routing Table: 4 Entries> on motherboard
> $PIR: BIOS IRQ 11 for 0.7.INTA is not valid for link 0x22
> $PIR: BIOS IRQ 11 for 0.7.INTB is not valid for link 0x22
>
> Can you send me the output of http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/pir.c
> to make sure that's not the problem.
Here it is:
$PIR table at 0x2816d890 version 1.0
PCI interrupt router at 0:0.0 vendor 0x0 device 0x0
PCI-only interrupts [ 11 ]
entry bus slot device
00: 00 00 08 INTA 00 [ ]
INTB 00 [ ]
INTC 00 [ ]
INTD 00 [ ]
01: 00 00 04 INTA 02 [ 9 ]
INTB 00 [ ]
INTC 00 [ ]
INTD 00 [ ]
02: 00 00 06 INTA 00 [ ]
INTB 00 [ ]
INTC 00 [ ]
INTD 00 [ ]
03: 00 00 07 INTA 22 [ 10 ]
INTB 22 [ 10 ]
INTC 22 [ 10 ]
INTD 22 [ 10 ]
> What does vmstat show for irq 10? How about other IRQs?
It doesn't show irq 10 at all:
interrupt total rate
irq0: clk 74997 99
irq1: atkbd0 975 1
irq6: fdc0 209 0
irq7: ppc0 1 0
irq8: rtc 96004 127
irq13: npx0 1 0
irq14: ata0 2777 3
irq15: ata1 50 0
Total 175014 233
--
Kirk Strauser
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050513/3ee54c13/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list