I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
Daniel Eischen
deischen at freebsd.org
Thu Mar 3 00:31:38 GMT 2005
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >
> > Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace
> > out of it?
>
> Because, as I said earlier this thread:
>
> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it
> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I
> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I
> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone
> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla
> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something.
>
> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a
> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to
> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom
> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work?
Is it that hard to type 'firefox -g', alias firefox="firefox -g", or
whatever, and use it that way for a few days to see if you can
get a trace? I'm just wondering if it has the same problem
as linuxpluginwrapper, or bad assumptions about mutexes
being recursive or unlocking one you don't own.
Most folks I know use the linuxpluginwrapper so we don't have
any experience with the native flash player. I think I recall
trying it and it not working, hence the use of linuxpluginwrapper.
--
DE
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list